Gary Weaver [email protected]
.018 stranded cables
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 21 of 21 known posts recovered
the ends are the most fragile part. Anything that puts a bend on the wire where it comes out of the termination(wrapped or crimped)can cause one or more strands of the cable to fatigue and break in short order. (Line reels that don't keep the end straight with the cable, tripping on the lines or snagging them on the pavement, pushing on the line towards the termination, etc.)
Now, I am going to guess that the problem in the end(s) breaking as you state is because you soldered the wire. Do not use solder, epoxy, or anything else hard when you do the connection. The wire ends are going to flex, and if they flex against a hard end they will break much sooner. This is the problem with crimped wires. It is a hard termination waiting to fail. Same if you solder the ends.
When you do your next set (or redo these) just wrap the wires and twist the ends together. Do not use any solder, epoxy, etc. as stated above. We have had lines made up this way go well into a thousand flights. But we have also determined that clean lines fly better. Terminate the ends properly. Clean them periodically with alcohol (or brake cleaner) by pouring some on a paper towel and running it up and down the lines a few times. And when they get so they will not clean properly (remember, dirt sneaks in between the strands) or if they get kinked, replace them.
Yes, as Currel says, if you hve 1000 feet of wire, use it.
If you should ge any kink in the cables, replace them!
Floyd
1. You have 1000 feet of line. That will make about 8 sets of lines.
2. You have put 300 flights on one set. Why?
Statements 1. and 2. don't mix 'n match.
Currell
DO NOT SOLDER.
You can download the correct process with diagrams from the CL rules section of the AMA rules on-line from the AMA site.
Also note that you can fly up to a .40ci size engine on .015" stranded lines and be within the AMA rules. Your .018' could be used on a .60 size plane.
FWIW
Curt
Iskandar Taib · Jul 23, 2004 11:50 PM
#6 sourceSome Europeans do solder their wire, they use carbon steel (some of it copper-plated).
If the lines pass inspection and pull tests, no reason to retire cables as long as they are not bent, kinked or walked on. Line reals and the way you attach the line to the real are probably harder on the lines than flights.
Just a question you have to ask yourself, "Do you feel lucky?" It's a calculated gamble of longevity vs. laziness..
Dave
Howard Rush · Aug 07, 2004 11:24 PM
#8 source>.018's this year before the Nats. I'd been using this set on
>and off for over 10 years and probably over 1000 flights.
>
>If the lines pass inspection and pull tests, no reason to
>retire cables as long as they are not bent, kinked or walked
>on. Line reels and the way you attach the line to the reel
>are probably harder on the lines than flights.
>
>Just a question you have to ask yourself, "Do you feel
>lucky?" It's a calculated gamble of longevity vs. laziness..
>
>Dave
Matt also retired a set of .018s just before the Nats this year. Must suffer from the same "laziness" as you since they, too, had many hundreds, if not a thousand flights on them (don't recall exactly when they were put into service.) He, however, flies over grass, and finds dirt (and oil) to be the biggest menace. Although he cleans them periodically with brake cleaner, and even "runs out" the lines with a paper towel, the plane had gradually become more and more difficult to fly level accurately. The lines, even though "cleaned", had become dirty, sticky, gummy, (pick one)--enough so that new lines made a dramatic improvement. His comment, "I am not going to wait as long next time to replace the lines."
I am curious, since you fly mostly over hard surfaces, did you notice any difference in control smoothness when you replaced your lines?
David Fitzgerald · Aug 16, 2004 05:38 PM
#10 source>you notice any difference in control smoothness when you
>replaced your lines?
No noticable change in smoothness. I did notice the new lines felt less smooth when I cleaned them. I do recommend cleaning with some sort of solvent. I use acetone every flight on solids, and about every 3-4 flights on cables.
>with brake cleaner, and even "runs out" the lines with a
>paper towel, the plane had gradually become more and more
>difficult to fly level accurately. The lines, even though
>"cleaned", had become dirty, sticky, gummy, (pick
>one)--enough so that new lines made a dramatic improvement.
>His comment, "I am not going to wait as long next time to
>replace the lines."
There's a lot of variation in what "cleaning" means, too. Squirting something on a paper towel and wiping only works for a while. I've been surpised at how much more goop you get out of stranded lines when you keep the paper towel "flooded" with solvent. Do the usual thing, but keep refreshing the solvent with a squirt every 5 feet or so so it's effectively running through a puddle of cleaner. I've done some experiments with cleaning with all available cleaners the usual way until I got no residue on the towel. Works OK. Then do it the "flood" way, and you still get an alarming amount of goop off of it for 5-6 passes. You can easily feel the difference in flight, too.
It's my opinion that a medium-speed lacquer thinner is the best thing to use for cables; acetone doesn't get as many different contaminents. SIG Airplane cleaner works pretty well, too. Acetone works better for solids since it evaporates a lot faster. Every time I used alcohol, it didn't seem to work well at all, even 99.9% isopropyl, and I can't even begin to imagine using it on solids, since the residual water left behind or sucked out of the air has got to be bad.
Cables do wear out - I noticed at the NATs this year that the airplane end of my well-used cables had a lot different look than the handle end. On closer inspection, it looked like the strands had worn flat spots, as if the individual strands were no longer round in cross-section. I couldn't measure the size difference, but it was quie obvious that it had worn.
Brett
p.s. one more thing, that you would think might be obvious, but apparently not. Use a *clean* paper towel or rag to clean the lines! A few NATs ago, I was talking to a PAMPA luminary about his hunting problems - I won't say who. Anyway, I was watching this unnamed person cleaning his lines with a rag that looked like he had cleaned out the oil pan on his Volvo wagon with it. I said "Frank, what the heck are you doing cleaning off your solid lines with that filthy rag - don't you suppose that you are leaving something behind?" I gave him a paper towel, he cleaned his lines, viola, no more hunting.
Randy Powell · Aug 17, 2004 02:29 PM
#15 sourceI clean my lines about every 3 or 4 flight (braided cable) and every other time I clean them, I follow it up using silicon based goop that coats the lines and makes them quite slick. I've heard varying reports on the usefulness of this, but I can say that I mostly fly on grass that is often a bit wet and have substantially reduced problems with lines sticking together when wet since I started using this. I can feel a difference even when it's not wet.
But maybe it's just me.
>I clean my lines about every 3 or 4 flight (braided cable)
>and every other time I clean them, I follow it up using
>silicon based goop that coats the lines and makes them quite
>slick. I've heard varying reports on the usefulness of this,
>but I can say that I mostly fly on grass that is often a bit
>wet and have substantially reduced problems with lines
>sticking together when wet since I started using this. I can
>feel a difference even when it's not wet.
>
>But maybe it's just me.
Does this goop attract dirt in any way? That would be my concern. If you coat the lines with something and fly over grass, it looks like dirt is about to win out. It might also add a bit of weight to the lines, as well.
Are you saying that Michigan air is dirty? Granted I fly here all the time and my lines get dirty with every flight, but I have noticed the same thing in IL, IN, OH, PA, IA...etc and even when I was flying in Korea and Canada. To keep things smooth, I generally wipe down the lines after every session and sometimes during a session if I am getting a significant number of flights in (4 or more). I use either alcohol or acetone occasionally, but generally just hit them with a clean dry paper towel.
As for Gary's original question, I have not had any general problems with 0.018" lines, but did find my first single strand break in a set of 0.015" lines that I have used for maybe 5 years (~100 flights per year). Wiping them down after every session helps to keep the PM up. The 0.015" lines were crimped and the strand was broke at the edge of the crimp probably due to an overbend or excessive bends at that point. In any case, a new set has been made and will be monitored for any problems in the future
John
And yes, I have cables that are easily 10 years old, but I don't have a count on how many flights. I've had leadouts on my control handle break before, not the control lines. Of course NOW I'll probably snap one the next flight.
From somewhere near Parkville, Mo.
William Crane
AMA 6733
Phil Spillman
Phil,
Your engine emits a cloud of exhaust smoke so thick you can see it. Every lap you drag your lines right into big wads of this visible exhaust.
As has been mentioned, cables are really hard to get super clean. Thus at the beginning of each season, April 1st to be exact, I drop all my line sets, still on individual reels, into an equal-parts mix of SIG airplane cleaner, acetone, medium lacquer thinner, and propylene oxide. After bathing in this mix for a full day I have no further problems with these lines for another year.
Dan
Noticable non-stick......of course I generally hog-tie myself and have to trash the things before long anyhow.
See Ya
Peabody