Charlie Stone (The West Australian one)
Photos of a plane that doesn't Stunt
Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 15 of 15 known posts recovered
Dennis Pedersen
Last time I tried B class, all we managed to do was keep setting fire to it! That was with an iron piston G21/29 not a ringed motor.
Cheers John
>Very Tasty Charlie, what lap times and range are you getting
>out of it?
>Last time I tried B class, all we managed to do was keep
>setting fire to it! That was with an iron piston G21/29 not
>a ringed motor.
>Cheers John
Charlie Stone (The West Australian one)
greggles47 · Jul 26, 2004 07:06 AM
#6 sourceWhere did you source those great looking wheels?
Greg
Thanks
Paul
I am a retread, - I did C/L in my youth and did not know what I was doing then other then having fun. And not much has changed.
>
>Where did you source those great looking wheels?
>
>Greg
Greg,
The wheels are home made (from black nylon - we fly off grass), just like most of the other bits in this one like the shutoff and the pilot (made from 1/4 of a kleenex tissue).
Perhaps these photos of the wheels will help.
Charlie Stone (The West Australian one)
Swordsman18 · Jul 26, 2004 10:18 AM
#8 sourceFor those who are interested, Tony Elmores has the original Aeromodeler article for the Dalesman posted:
http://www.the.elmores.btinternet.co.uk/articles/cwdata/dalesman1.html
http://www.the.elmores.btinternet.co.uk/articles/cwdata/dalesman2.html
Andy
Edit: Almost forgot: BEAUTIFUL ship!
AT
Dave Simons sent me photos of another Dalesman, and the plans.. Looks like a great airplane. This is the one event out of stunt that I am interested in, I just wish there was at least 50 hours in a day to get all my "future" projects done!
Tom Niebuhr
Tom N
Ian R.
Kim Mortimore · Jul 26, 2004 08:02 PM
#12 sourceCharlie,
How much faster are the fastest Classic B T/Rs? I assume Classic period engines are required, which could lead to rules squabbles (or at least would do so here in the Untied States of Arguments) regarding modernized engine guts.
Lovely bird.
Cheers,
Kim Mortimore
>
>How much faster are the fastest Classic B T/Rs? I assume
>Classic period engines are required, which could lead to
>rules squabbles (or at least would do so here in the Untied
>States of Arguments) regarding modernized engine guts.
>
>Lovely bird.
>
>Cheers,
>Kim Mortimore
At present about 110 -115 MPH. Engines (max .29 displacement) can be Classic racing engines if manufactured before 1961 (replicas allowed)or any modern engine with plain bearing crankshaft. The reason being that there is a limited supply of the older motors, and they are more difficult to handle anyway - especially with regard to restarts. The current fast ones are all using modern engines (ABC) like OS FP .25s or similar and they are being modified by the engine specialists. My partner Norm Kirton and myself have stayed with the old ringed ETA .29s.
Charlie Stone (The West Australian one)
Pete Munroe · Jul 26, 2004 10:24 PM
#14 sourceThat plane is great looking...I suppose the "rat racer" was easier to build, but they always looked so lame compared to a semi-scale pylon racer.
The "proto"?...(is that the name of the class from the 60's scale like team racers?)...racers that looked like real planes instead of a balsa/magnesium projectiles seem more fun to look at or watch...harder to build of course, and I do not know how high the "loss rate" is for an actively raced model...but the look seems to be worth it from a spectators standpoint.
Team racing is quite a show to watch, have seen the 1/2A "mouse" racers at Whittier Narrows in Los Angeles a few times, great show.
Good work.
Pete