Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

More of Mike Palko's electric stunter

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 17 of 17 known posts recovered

V12 · Jul 26, 2004 12:06 PM

#0 source
It just keeps getting better. On a very windy/gusty day, the plane penetrated the wind and flew flawlessly. The plane's performance, along with Mike's exceptional flying ability, placed him third in EXPERT.
Could this innovation in powerplants have the same impact on the sport as the tuned pipe did? With the technology advancing the way it is, we may all be in for quite a pleasant surprise (or, shock!). Not to mention some understandable reductions in noise complaints.
Bob Z

Proparc · Jul 26, 2004 02:01 PM

#1 source
Windy talked about "more choices" when 4 strokes came on. As I see it, electrics in stunt just provides more choices as to powerplants. 4 stroke motors did not take over stunt the way previous motors did way back when. When the OS Max 35\40S supplanted the venerable Fox 35, everybody made the move. When the ST46 came on the seen, you simply had to "get with it." When the ST60 came on, you had better jump on board. That is not the way it is now. Piped motors, 4 strokes, 2-4 breaking 2 strokes, electrics, all provide viable stunt go-power. This puts the focus on plane design. That is, optimizing the partcular ship for the power used. The Skywriter is a plane highly optimized for the ST60. I do not see electrics taking over stunt, or, put another way, you have to have one to be competitive; but,it will absolutely be a player in stunt at all levels. I for one, would certainly like to have one for local sport field practice. I do strongly believe that this "diversity" in powerplant choices will positively impact the sport of stunt by way of providing more avenues for access.

Milton Graham\Proparc

bigseminole · Jul 26, 2004 02:57 PM

#6 source

It appoears to me as if the move from the Fox-35 to the ST-46's, 60's and now four strokes, was fueled by the larger, more powerfull engines providing a clear competitive edge over the powerplants that they superceded.

Also, progression from Fox 35s to more powerfull powerplants, saw us only having to reapply the pieces of the technology puzzle that we already knew and had control of, to satisfy a new list of components.

Now that the electric revolution has begun to nibble its way into the stunt world, many, if not most of us, are learning about equipment that we don't really understand.

I'm sure that if Mike's setup was available as a package that guys could purchase and install in an airplane, quite a few units would have been sold already. As things stand,it will take a few more pioneers experimenting with various battery packs, motors, controllers and airframes, combined with a selection of better (MOre efficient.)motors and batteries, before large numbers of flyers begin to jump on the electronic bandwagon.

If it was as simple as selling off the Foxes and installing the electronics into a Nobler, there would be a raft of nice engines available on Ebay this week!

Bigs

Howard Rush · Jul 26, 2004 02:05 PM

#2 source
It's more significant than tuned pipes. It's more like flaps. Mike showed us all at the Nats that electrics are possible. They have sufficient energy for a pattern and sufficient power for the wind. It was an amazing revelation. Their potential as stunt powerplants is greater than that of internal combustion engines. I think Brett and you other G/1+GH guys can see why.

It depends on how you perceive control line flying, though. For me, stunt is something I did as a kid. I'm doing it now partly because I like the continuity of experience. Electric stunt has different sounds and smells. It may not appeal to current stunt flyers, and new folks with no memories of bygone toy airplane days would probably take up electric RC instead.

Steve Fitton · Jul 26, 2004 02:20 PM

#3 source
A cool feature of Mike's plane is that it sounds just like your standard tuned pipe job-just quieter.

When he presses the button on the front and that prop snarls to life, its almost scary how powerful that thing is.

But I'd hate to see what happens if something shorts out-there is alot of energy in those batteries that might be detrimental to your plane!

Steve

dirtydan · Jul 26, 2004 02:47 PM

#5 source
From Howard Rush:

"It's more significant than tuned pipes. It's more like flaps."

Agreed. Although I must say that a brief conversation with Howard this last weekend served only to reinforce my angst concerning the now-proven and more-coming-soon electric CL Stunt models.

A lot of you are approaching this as merely another way of powering our models, and that is fine from a sport-flying viewpoint, as the more salient issues will be getting enough spare packs to keep the action flowing, figuring out how to get good charges, switching motor on to begin a flight, some airborne means of cutting the power.

Pretty basic stuff. For a pretty basic application.

However, when we introduce some serious competition into our thinking, in my point of view this "is going to get ugly," to use a phrase I entered onto this site and never fully--or even partially--explained, there is potential to see it happen so quickly that last month's trick is today's obsolete junk.

Imagine showing up at a CL Stunt contest where operational parameters are being fed to model from a lap top computer. There are ways to measure each and every one of the "needs" of an in-flight CL Stunt model. If it can be measured, a suitable response from the electric motor(s), maybe even direction in which it/they is/are pointed, can be supplied to onboard gizmos manipulating things in ways we have not yet even thought of.

Even above might soon be quite basic, as it is (today) possible to get real-time data downloaded from model and then spend the time between rounds optimizing software instead of trying to figure out which prop to fly next or whether that needle ought be tweaked.

I mean, if Honda R&D, in Japan, can tell when Sato's Formula 1 engine is going to blow up, Sato is in the car and is clueless at time of grenading a really cool 3.0-liter V-10 spinning at something in excess of 18,500, how hard can it be to get a limited number of readings from a model no more than 200 feet away?

We'll all have to buy pocket protectors just to be taken seriously.

Y'all have fun. I'll be watching from over here on the sidelines where memberships in the Flat Earth Society are being sold.

Dan

Tim McTigue · Jul 26, 2004 04:56 PM

#8 source
"...served only to reinforce my angst concerning the now-proven and more-coming-soon electric CL Stunt models."

At the risk of being labelled a Luddite, I will also weigh in with concern, but a more basic concern, since I have no pretentions to competition status... I am so far just a sport flier. Yet the headlong rush to adopt electric propulsion (should it occur, and it looks inevitable) also fills me with unease, in that I could forsee the environmentalists lobbying very quickly to ban glow engines altogether. I like the smell of castor oil, and I like glow engines. I can't imagine getting a whole lot of enjoyment out of the hobby if my glow engines were taken away. Okay, maybe the electrics would still have a similar sound (a good deal of the sound comes from the prop, anyway), and maybe they would fly the same, and there's still the building to consider, which wouldn't really change much, but I would definitely miss the glow engine if it should pass into history...

Tim

MAAC 65703

Swordsman18 · Jul 27, 2004 08:56 AM

#11 source
LAST EDITED ON Jul-27-04 AT 09:05 AM (CDT)
 
Yet the headlong rush to adopt electric
>propulsion (should it occur, and it looks inevitable) also
>fills me with unease, in that I could forsee the
>environmentalists lobbying very quickly to ban glow engines
>altogether

Tim,

I submit that were this the case, there would be only electric RC models in existence today. The fact that RC is still by and large dominated by glow and gasoline powered engines would indicate that your worries are groundless. Control line is a negligible fraction of the model airplane hobby and would never show up on the political radar screen by itself. The RC industry would be the logical target, and so far there has been no political pressure to force RC flyers to go all electric even though it has been a somewhat viable alternative for something like a decade. I contend that this is because even the HUGE RC hobby (as we perceive it) is negligible in the grand scheme of the economy and politics. I of course am speaking as an American, not a Canadian, but I think the analysis is valid for Canada too.

As for a "headlong rush" to electric power, I would suggest that electric CL will evolve steadily but at a moderate pace over the next 5-10 years and will offer some really exciting technology which will allow more flying closer to population centers due to clean and quiet operation. It will not replace glow power, just as it has not done so for RC.

But I really wouldn't worry about environmental protesters with picket signs at your local CL flying site, demanding that you stop using your dirty glow engines. There is far more pollution from 2-cycle lawn mowers, chain saws, weed whackers, and snow blowers, and yes, some environmentalists are becoming interested in limiting them. Model airplane engines are negligible polluters by comparison.

You can rest easy. Nobody is going to knock on your door and demand that you surrender your Fox 35s any time soon .

JMHO,

Andy

slewin · Jul 27, 2004 11:47 AM

#12 source
I'm with Andy. There are already many places where you simply cannot fly models with IC engines but quieter electric powered ones are acceptable. This trend will certainly continue.

Electrics seem like a really good thing to me because they will expand the hobby. It's working for RC and I don't see why CL shouldn't get part of the action. Particularly if young people coming into the hobby can fly locally, maybe at their school, instead of having to drag their parents out to drive them to some far away club field. I don't suppose we'll ever get back to the good old days when almost every school had an aeromodelling club but we could get a lot closer.

Steve

N42222 · Jul 27, 2004 08:33 AM

#10 source
Ditto.

Proparc · Jul 26, 2004 02:20 PM

#4 source
LAST EDITED ON Jul-26-04 AT 04:23 PM (CDT)
 
I also believe, that Mike may have given us the Control Line Stunt ARF this sport really needed. It is no secret that electric ARF's in RC are a runaway success. I personally have seen quite a few modelers learning to fly RC by way of electric ARF's. Mike's design looks like a potential hit. It is a proven competition electric design in a relatively simple structural platform. While the Nobler and Flitestreak ARFs were a good first step, based on the comments in this forum by people who purchased them, my perception is that they may not have quite hit the proverbial "nail on the head." All the elements for a very successful Stunt ARF seemed to be embodied in Mike's plane.

Milton Graham\Proparc

Rustler · Jul 26, 2004 04:21 PM

#7 source
How do I fit a tuned pipe to an electric motor?

Ian R.

iroquois · Jul 27, 2004 06:32 AM

#9 source
Ian,
With the same piece of string that you use now.

Baron · Jul 27, 2004 06:44 PM

#13 source
I use twist-ties off of bread wrappers my wife saves for me....

Craig Beskow

greatcircle · Jul 27, 2004 08:35 PM

#14 source
I am impressed with the use of electrics in stunt models. I believe with noise police on the increase, it will only become more possible. I mean, we have enough people who can't leave well enough alone--er-- I mean are experimenters--so improvements will come rapidly now that the naysayers have gone back to predicting that buggy whips will again become popular. The genie is out of the bottle, and he ain't going back in! I would like to get a House of Balsa Chipmunk--I LOVE scale, convert it to c/l, and while I am at it, power it with an electric motor. Hmmmmm. Probably wouldn't loop or anything, but ya never know... Another project for retirement--in about 351 days.

Carl

PJ · Aug 01, 2004 04:46 AM

#15 source
I thought the electric was a real gutsy move. To prove everyone wrong.
IT DID penetrate..

But the rules would have to be altered if it was mainstream.. " flicked by hand starting.. " ect..

Im working on the 1st Rubber F2B model. I need a ##### long rubber band and it takes a long time to turn it enough times for 7 mins!

Outside triangles?

shelby554 · Aug 01, 2004 09:28 AM

#16 source
I'm kinda like Tim, in that I love these tiny internal combustion engines. I find them to be, by far, the most interesting aspect of airplane modelling, and if we had to go to electrics, I would find another hobby. Heck, I just love piston engines of all sizes, from our little engines, to giant Diesel engines.

Don Jones