I have a couple of questions here. If we are adding thinner after the fact, aren't we cooling off what we already heated up? And what kind of dope was being used in this process? Some of the old Aero Gloss and Testors and even SIG variants were rather slow drying. Not the new Brodak. The person you are referring to (and probably you, yourself) have never tried the presently available product.
I can understand that heating dope will make it flow easier and also dry quicker. Might work with some of the older, runny (too thin) dope. You boil off some of the thinner, then heat it to make it flow. Quicker drying. But if the dope is properly formulated and you use quick drying thinner, you accomplish the same thing. And if you are painting in conditions where the drying time needs to be slowed down, you are going counterpurpose.
If your dope is already too thin, you can just leave the lid off the can (or jar) for a while. You don't need to boil it. Even if it skims over, this can be stirred up and it will all disolve again.
But it sounds a bit like the guy saying, "Use a stock LA 46. Don't change a thing!" I have to ask "What venturi was yours supplied with?" (at least 6, maybe 7 different sizes were supplied with these things with no indication on the box or the instructions that this was so.) What dope are you using? What thinner are you using? How thin is the dope before this is tried? These are all pertinent questions to be asked...and answered.
It still smells like trying to fix a bad batch of dope, and certainly not a catch-all solution as in "take any brand and do this".