>In this land of free speach Which we have the right to
>express. Just beacause you think diffrently than I do does
>that make you or I wrong? I think not.
Yes. America is a grest country, in part because anyone can say anything they want, no matter how ridiculous, and the government can't stop them (ref. Democratic National Convention, Michael Moore). The same applies to responses to ridicuous statements.
Of course, this is a private forum and the proprieter can decide what to allow and what not to allow. The First Amendment does not apply to private enterprise
On objective matters, if we think differently, one of us is wrong. Not a debatable point. On a matter of opinion, we could both be right, wrong, or somewhere in between.
For instance, if you make a statement like "combat planes turn tighter because..." then that is an objective statement, and depending on the ..., can be right or wrong. It might have multiple aspects, but it's not a matter of opinion.
Alternately, if you say "I think I will score more points if I ...", then there can be differing opinions about that, legitimately. But you must base those opinions on something, and it's perfectly resonable and to be expected that if that opinion is at variance with someone else, or general wisdom, that someone may inquire as to your basis for having it.
>What I precive to be true and correct is for me and maybe
>not for you. But if we all thought the same way we would
>have never gone to the moon. Everything I write here is my
>opinion you do with it what you want.
Free expression is fine - but uni-directional declarations are really *not* what "free exchange of ideas means" I don't think anyone objects to your opinion. I for one am curious to explore your concepts. But you aren't interacting - when someone asks a question, you belittle them or make spurious references to other people. If you have an opinion, be able to explain why you hold that opinion. No one is going to pay any attention to you otherwise, aside from getting irritated.
>One thing I have
>noticed is that the topics I write on(be it a sore spot or
>not) Get more play than most..
Right, trolling can be quite effective for catching fish.
Many of the frequent posters here know more about this event in every aspect, than you do - far more. You have no detectable history in this event, and simply mouthing off and talking down to people who do will get you categorized as a net.kook very quickly. Search the archives for references to "FUBAR", "FloydC" and "PauleyP" for examples. These guys all had something useful to contribute (well, maybe not Floyd) but couldn't get past the tendency to "cover" their weak points by browbeating people and complaining about their "rights" when challenged to provide a basis, and generally conducting themselves like the output end of a horse.
You're well down that road, but not irretrievably.