Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Stuka Stunt Main Forum

Vector/ST46 Combo

Stuka Stunt Main Forum · 13 of 13 known posts recovered

347Cougar · Jan 31, 2007 11:50 AM

#0 source
I'm trying to find a new home for my ST 46. Can someone please advise me as to whether or not it will fit in one of the Vector ARF's without major modifications? Are the engine bearers wide enough? Is it too heavy?

I know from reading on here that most folks are using the Brodak 40 or Randy Smith's 36, but I have this brand new ST 46 that runs great and would like to save some money and not have to buy a new engine if possible.

I tried doing a search and came back with a lot of information on the Vectors, but could not actually find if anyone had tried this combination. I guess my other alternative would be the T/F Score, but I really prefer the appearance of the Vector.

Thanks

Vince

captcurt · Jan 31, 2007 12:03 PM

#1 source
Just my $.02...the Vector 40 is pretty narrow up front--even using a larger than drawn spinner and associated taper to the nose, it is narrow. It is also not a very large plane although it is draggy.

THe ST would loaf along in afour most of theime I think--if you have a shoehorn.

The bearers are pretty much right on for an Thunder tiger .36/ aerotiger or Ro40.



[photo not recovered: 22004.jpg]


[photo not recovered: 22005.jpg]


[photo not recovered: 22006.jpg]


Curt

Attachment #1, (jpg file)
Attachment #2, (jpg file)
Attachment #3, (jpg file)

Leo Mehl · Jan 31, 2007 12:22 PM

#2 source
Vince,l I had a kitVector that I built from a Brodak kit. I painted this model when I was recovering from heart sugery and it got pretty heavy because I kept making mistakes when I mixed the paint. I put a Tigre 46 in it with the smallest venture that came with the engine . the plane came out very heavy and didn't fly very good so it sat on the walfor about a year so I decided to sand it and repaint. The plane still came out tail heavy, so had to add lots of nose wieght. This plane came out at 54 ounces and still flew very good. I think the venture was bored out to 97 thousands and would do the pattern on 4 and a half ounces of fuel. Before I bored it out it would run 10 min on the same amount of fuel I used an 11X 5 Zinger prop. Any Questions call me at 503-255-6471
Leo J Mehl

Bob Reeves · Jan 31, 2007 04:34 PM

#3 source
This wasn't a Vector but may give you some ideas.

I managed to stuff a ST 46 in a Nobler ARF. Set it as far back on the motor mounts as it would go and built a cowl instead of using the fiberglass one that came with it. Mounts were not quite wide enough so I put strips of 1/16 circuit board material on the mounts and cut the top of the circuit board and mounts at an angle so the engine would go in. Didn't take that much and I would believe the Vector is wider.

Don't have a photo of the finished product handy but here is one that was taken right after I painted the nose. It ended up at 42 ounces with a tongue muffler but expect I will need to add an ounce or so of tail weight when I start trim flights.



[photo not recovered: 22008.jpg]

Attachment #1, (jpg file)

warren_lead · Feb 01, 2007 01:05 AM

#4 source
Hi

My Vector 40 is from a Brodak kit and it is a little porky at 48 oz I use an OS40LA-S and it flies pretty good. I have also tried a OS46LA-S (which is the same physical size as the 40) and a lot of people say it's comparable to a ST46 performance wise. Food for thought if you like the plane.

Warren Leadbeatter
Port Stephens - Australia
AUS-14782

Merco 35 · Feb 02, 2007 06:43 AM

#5 source
Hello all.
I´ve check my Tigre 46 is a perfect fit for the ARF Vector.
I´ll use it when build the plane (along this year, expect).
Hope it helps.
Manuel.

347Cougar · Feb 02, 2007 09:51 AM

#6 source
Thanks Manuel, that's the answer that I was hoping for.

Vince

warren_lead · Feb 02, 2007 10:19 AM

#7 source
I just got a ST46 today and have just compared it to my LA 46. (which is the same dimensions as a LA40)

The ST G21 46 is about 1/16" wider at the mounting lugs, about 1/8" shorter in length and about the same height.

So yes it should fit.

Warren Leadbeatter
Port Stephens - Australia
AUS-14782

347Cougar · Feb 03, 2007 09:36 PM

#8 source
Well, I ordered a Vector ARF today. I'll let you know how the motor fits in there. Hopefully I won't have to do much shaving or carving.

Thanks for all the advice.

347Cougar · Feb 08, 2007 07:54 PM

#9 source
It fits like a glove. I can't see any interference problems. The thrust washer sticks out a little too far from the cowl ring, but no far enough to be a problem for me.

Here's a photo.

Thanks for the help

Vince

[photo not recovered: 22119.jpg]

Attachment #1, (jpg file)

captcurt · Feb 08, 2007 07:58 PM

#10 source
Looks just fine.

Curt

flightstreak · Feb 09, 2007 11:46 AM

#11 source

Hello,I have a ST46 in my Score and after trying to trim it and make it comfortable to fly I feel it needs a bigger engine.It doesnt have it on the overhead manuvers.I have a ST 51 I may try but im leaning toward a ST60. The plane does basic manuvers well,but when it needs the power its not there. Just a thought. George Eckhardt

captcurt · Feb 09, 2007 01:20 PM

#12 source
The score is a MUCH bigger plane than the Vector 40.

I've seen the Score fly pretty well with an LA46 but to be competitive I think it needs a 50. A 60 muffled is probably not out of the question considering the current powering trends.

FWIW

Curt