Stuka Stunt Control Line Forum
Archive, 2000–2021 · recovered from the Internet Archive
Forums › Product Reviews

Top Flight SCORE Building

Product Reviews · 10 of 10 known posts recovered

J Ashford · Jun 01, 2006 12:58 PM

edited#0 source
I am presently in the middle of a TF Score for a customer and have some observations that may help you. As I complete the plane I will update this.

The first thing I do is look at the bell crank. The lead outs are too short to turn the bell crank around and put the up line as the lead line. It also has only a three inch BC and the instructions say to put the push rod in the far outside hole. Lead-outs are cable double wrapped through the bell crank and crimped. I don't think strength will be an issue. The lead outs are individually adjustable. The Bell crank is made of pretty hard material and is similar to the old Veco/Fox units with a brass bushing. It is mounted with a metric bolt about the size of a 6-32.

CA hinges are included in the kit but I updated to barrel hinges. I would have used the flap push rod but it is 3/8 inch too short. The wing also has stops that limit the bell crank movement and on this one you could get 30 one way and only 25 the other so I had to do some carving to get 30 both ways. The wing was straight and the flaps were also. The flap horn needed to be tweaked to have them in the same plane but it was very close as it came.

This plane is designed as a take apart but my customer doesn't want that. I did use the dowels and screws to test fit the wing and although it is close it is not as good as the Nobler. The clearance for the flap horn is in the wrong place and is too tight. I had to file about 1/4" notch to make that work smoothly. The bottom fuselage filler also does not fit perfectly and when test fitted was about 1/16th above the fuselage both in front and back. The fuselage to wing fitting has a few gaps but if you are going to glue it, it is acceptable. The bottom piece doesn't fit well at all.

Flap to elevator push rod is kind of a neat concept. Aluminum 3/8 tube with some kind of nylon/silicone/plastic insert. Push rods that are intended to be screwed into this are 1/16th and one of them is about 8 inches long. One is threaded one one end and then a Z bend on the other. The other is threaded both ends and intended for a clevis connection. This would allow for very easy adjustment of the elevator throw because the plane also has HUGE access plates under the stab. But I'm sorry, 1/16th wire for push rods is a bit much on this size plane. I put a ball link on the flap horn and made a carbon fiber PR for the elevator.

MM instructions: Beware!!! Follow the instructions. This is designed for engine offset. They use RC type beam mounts and they are cast/built to do just that. I am so used to building zero offset for mounting engines that I thought it was an error in the instructions. NOT! But is sure looks funny when you mark the holes.

The covering had some bubbles/wrinkles in it and I thought that would be no bigger problem than it was with the Nobler. WRONG! I did everything I know to do and actually wound up making it look worse. I can make my Nobler look pretty good but this one is not cooperating.

I am not slamming this kit/plane. I saw Mike Greb fly one last weekend at Houston and it performed very well. What I am trying to point out is that if you want a for sure competitive plane there are some things to watch out for. I think a newbie could put this plane together without a lot of problems and probably have a plane he/she was pleased with but the short flap push rod and 1/16 elevator push rod are issues that need to be addressed or you are going to have some big problems. (IMHO)

Finished up yesterday and was very pleased with the way the plane bolts together. Wing and Stab are perfectly aligned and I didn't have to do anything to get it there. Needed the Stock ST .51 muffler to make it balance at the suggested CG location on the instructions. All up weight RTF is 66 1/2 ounces which makes the wing loading 14.2 oz/ft.
Later, John
Later, John

J Ashford · Jun 07, 2006 05:06 AM

#1 source
This is just an update but I went over the time limit for editing the original post. I flew the plane and had to change to a tongue muffler for balance purposes. That makes the balance point 4 and 3/8ths behind the leading edge and the plane flys much better at that point (for me). No bad habits, turns a nice square corner with no tendendy to hinge or bounce. I have 3/4 ounce of tip weight and that seems about right. Line tension is very strong everywhere. Landings are a snap. Just let it land itself.

Later, John
Later, John

whicks · Jun 08, 2006 05:52 PM

#2 source
I weighed my Score on a Digital scale and it came out to 61 oz with RO Jett .61 Se RTF. The 68 oz as stated earlier was with another scale . Now If I can ever get the covering to shrink up and stay for a while!
Walter Hicks

Pattern Student · Aug 17, 2006 04:57 PM

#3 source
The covering on my Score looked LOTS better after I had it peeled off and in the trash!!

Jim
Jim Oliver

flightstreak · Sep 11, 2006 06:14 AM

#4 source
hi,i have 4 flights on my score,being old school i built it solid. had to reinforce landing gear mounts,strengthen cowling mount points,and epoxy all stress points. went to a 12-5 zinger,on my st-46 with muffler pressure.plane flies better than i can fly it. moved adjustable leadouts all the way to the rear. made quite an improvement. hope to enjoy for a long time.thanks,good flying george eckhardt
hi

WEVD · Sep 20, 2006 06:46 AM

#5 source
Any comments regarding putting an OS .46 VF on a pipe in one of these?
(rebuilding the controls, of course!!!!)

Ward
Ward

flightstreak · Jul 28, 2007 05:44 PM

#6 source

Hello, I put a ST-46 in mine,not enough power,Im going to put a ST-60 in it.The plane flies very good.This winter Im going to recover it. The original kote doesnt hold up.George Eckhardt

erik · Aug 06, 2007 02:31 PM

#7 source
I have had 3 Score ARFs and all 3 have had problems with their landing gear becoming loose over time. I haven't cut one open to see what's going on yet, and I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with fixing the gear. Did your fix hold? What did you do? Was it worth the effort?

The only other issue we've had with the Score ARF has been that one of them came with a significantly warped horizontal stab. Other than that they have been excellent flying planes.

Jim Oliver · Aug 06, 2007 05:21 PM

#8 source
Eric,

When I removed the covering on my wing, I noticed that not only are the L.G. struts not long enough to engage anything other than the grooved blocks---there isn't any structure for the struts to engage.

I took some firm 1/4 in. sheet, laminated 1/32 in. ply on both sides and made a plate for each gear strut to engage. I used epoxy to attach each plate to the spar and rib just below the top surface of the wing, then used the existing holes in the grooved blocks to locate a hole in each plate for new struts to engage.

I did not use the pants---ugly, anyway. Planned to make gear doors but haven't done that yet.

I think you could make the gear mount mods by removing the covering from one or two bays on the botom of each wing.

My Score weighs 64 ounces with ST 51, tongue muff, Tru Turn spinner and APC 12x6 prop. All the heavy stuff to get the CG right.

Jim

Gary · Aug 15, 2007 02:49 AM

#9 source
Hi guys, I have two different Score's. I removed the wing landing gear and made fuse landing gear. I didn't want to mess with the wing, so I took the easy way out. One landing gear is from my wrecked vector 40 and the other is one I copied from the vector 40 gear. I use only sixty size motors on mine. Anything smaller doesn't seem to work for me. Score is a nice flying plane just have to trim it out to your feel. Have a great day, Gary